Mon, 20 October 2008
Funding Regional Assets – A 10 year review by David Donahue

Rob Jones is currently the Chairman of the Local Government Academy's Board of Directors. At the time of the 2004 Road to Excellence Conference, he was Vice Chairman of LGA"s Board and Senior Manager of External Affairs at Dominion. Jones moderated a panel on intergovernmental revenue trends, tax-sharing, and public-private partnerships. David Donahue (right) was named the first Executive Director of the Allegheny Regional Asset District (ARAD) in 1995. Authorized by state law, The District distributes dedicated public funds to libraries, parks, cultural and regional attractions, and sports facilities in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County, Pa. Donahue gave a ten year review of the ARAD as they were celebrating their tenth anniversary. Donahue said that ARAD is an example of fiscal regionalism.

According to Donahue, these fiscal regionalism entities are government without being government because although they spend public money, they do not provide service. They provide for a distribution of the benefits of growth to neighboring municipalities where growth occurs. Fiscal regionalism entities minimize fiscal mercantilism, which encourages development other than tax-producing development, Donahue explained. These entities prevent free-riding so that all people who benefit share in the cost. True tax-base sharing agreements are very rare, and fiscal regionalism can incorporate some of the benefits of these agreements into the region. The entities help avoid the wins and losses associated with annexation laws and they try to level the playing field as far as wealth and service disparities. Before the ARAD was created, Pittsburgh was paying 56% of the bill for regional assets like museums, stadiums, libraries, the zoo, etc. when it only had 25% of the county’s tax base. A sales tax increase of 1% took place in 1994, where about 75% is paid by the residents of Allegheny County and 25% is paid by nonresidents. The pot is divided every month, where 50% is allocated among regional assets, 25% goes to the County, and 25% is distributed among the rest of the municipalities. The municipal distribution formula measures municipal tax burden relative to other municipalities. Donahue mentioned that the ARAD reduces reliance on property tax and other taxes and all that benefit and use regional assets pay into it. Finally, ARAD promotes cooperation and private initiative, and makes available more private funding and state funds like intergovernmental aid. Donahue closed by recommending a clear communications plan between stakeholders before the agreement is made.

Direct download: donahuepodcast.mp3
Category: 2004 Road to Excellence Conference -- posted at: 11:05 PM
Comments[0]

Categories

2004 Road to Excellence Conference
2005 Road to Excellence Conference
2008 Road to Excellence Conference
Development, Conservation, and Land Use
Full Conference-2007 Road to Excellence Conference
Full conference - 2008 Road to Excellence Conference
Highlights from the 2007 Road to Excellence Conference
Highlights from the 2008 Road to Excellence Conference
Stormwater Management
podcasts

Syndication


Keyword Search
Archives
2008
February
March
June
October
November

2007
August




Other LGA Resources

Other LGA Resources

Local Government Academy Website

Intergovernmental Cooperation Success Stories wiki

Adaptive Governance wiki

Local Government Job Network

Topics

A Regional Approach to Water Management and Comprehensive Planning

Attempt for Cameron County Consolidation

Attempt for Shenango Valley Consolidation I

Attempt for Shenango Valley Consolidation II

Building Capacity of Local Government

Case Studies of Water Conflict in Florida

Collaboration and Water Management in Upper St. Clair

Communication, Education, and Public Outreach

Conclusions Towards Adapting Governance

Expectations of Local Government from the Business Sector

Five Challenges to Adaptive Governance

Green Roof Demonstration Project

Intergovernmental Cooperation, Municipal Consolidation, and Boundary Change

Legal Incentives for Cooperation and Adapting Governance

Lower Watersheds and Water Management Issues in the Borough of Etna

New Strategies of Public Involvement

Rural Watersheds and Municipal Authorities

State and Local Government Relationships

The History of Boroughs

The Pine Creek Watershed Assessment Project

The Regional Water Management Task Force and Multi-Municipal Collaboration

The Role of Local Government

The Role of the DEP in Water Management

The Structure and Functions of Local Government

Traditional Neighborhood Development

Tutorial on Clean Water Act Compliance

Uses of Water

Speakers

Andree, Jerry

Broughton, Sue

Cigler, Beverly

Duffalo, Michael

Foreman, Michael

Frederickson, Dr. H. George

French, Janie

Garber, Kevin

Gearhart, George

Gourley, Ty

Herr, Elam

Klaum, Tom

Kugler, Alan

McNees, Barbara

Moscato, Anthony

Myers, Cathleen Curran

Nurse, Leanne Smith

Onorato, Dan

Ramage, Mary Ellen

Schombert, John

Stiftel, Dr. Bruce

Tulip, Tom

Villotti, Lew

Watkins, Doug